What Makes a Great City
by singaporearmchaircritic
“There is a certain something in the air, in the look and in the sound of Paris, that cannot be found anywhere else.” George Sand
I am back from my sojourn in Paris, a place I knew I would miss dearly even before my return to Singapore. My friend tried to console me, “Maybe you’ll bring back a new perspective; a new way of looking at your city.”
During my month-long stay in Paris, my dormant right brain had taken over and I had not been keeping up with what’s going on in Singapore, which explains why my blog was growing cobwebs. On the long flight home I tried to remind myself what I love about the place where I was born and bred: the people dear to me, the luscious greenery, the beautiful shophouses, a good, thick cup of kopi, the safe environment, and my relatively cushy job.
But the more I delved into it, the more I realized what’s missing in Singapore: here I seldom get the sense that I was living. Alive, yes, but merely going through the motions. The city is uninspiring and souless; what I see and experience here often fill me with anger and a sense of injustice. For sure, these emotions drive me to continue blogging; yet at the same time they burn me out.
Perhaps I am not alone in feeling so. In the past few years, there has been a general mood of anger and bitterness in our society, predominantly at the government’s missteps that many perceived have created hardships for Singaporeans.
The emotions are so pervasive that some saw it timely to remind us that “Singapore must not become an angry and bitter society,” “Let’s not criticize for the sake of it,” and ah, my favorite platitude: “Be thankful for what we have” (all on Yahoo news, I wonder why).
It is easy to attribute our unhappiness to the nature of Singaporeans, that we complain too much. For what is not likeable about Singapore, baffled detractors may ask. We are Asia’s most liveable city, for goodness sake.
Yet liveable does not mean lovable, as this Financial Times article perspicaciously points out. The author cites a professor of urban development:
We need to ask, what makes a city great? If your idea of a great city is restful, orderly, clean, then that’s fine. You can go live in a gated community… Descartes, writing about 17th century Amsterdam, said that a great city should be ‘an inventory of the possible.’ I like that description.
Singapore hardly fits Descartes’ description. In fact, if we compare the four predominantly Chinese societies today, Singapore is only less restrictive than China. A saying goes:
In Hong Kong, you can do anything except that which is forbidden by law; In Singapore, you cannot do anything except that which is permitted by law; In Taiwan, you can do anything including that which is forbidden by law; In China, you cannot do anything including that which is permitted by law (original saying in Chinese).”
Time and again, people who push the boundaries in Singapore are singled out and punished when our government thinks we are getting out of hand. The “sticker-lady” incident and the recent arrest of the cartoonist behind Demon-cratic Singapore only affirm what we already know – that Singapore is an inventory of the impossible.
Besides a repressive milieu that stifles creativity, the alacrity with which urban planners destroy our heritage also disturbs me. Of course, Singapore has only a very short history but does that not make it more compelling for us to preserve what little heritage we have? The old National Library building and others were long gone, and Bukit Brown is going. What price progress?
Paris is facing a housing shortage. The city’s century-old Metro system is amazingly efficient but totally inaccessible for the handicapped. To solve these problems, our government would no doubt be ruthless in demolishing the old to make way for the new.
But not Paris. The majority of Parisians opposed the building of skyscrapers. Despite the shortage of space, the dead are left to rest in peace – the city has a number of cemeteries where the famous are buried plus an underground ossuary, the Catacombs, which have attracted tourists from all over the world. Medieval houses are still standing in Paris and you can easily find a café rich in history to sip your café-crème in. All these are part of Paris’s charm.
The most magical moment I had in Paris was in the first few days when I was traveling on the Metro and suddenly there was this beautiful voice flowing through the train. It was a busker plying his trade. From then on buskers singing or playing music on the train always brightened up my day, notwithstanding the blasé look on the faces of Parisians.
Ah, how I miss the sights and sounds of Paris!
We have just hosted a lady friend from France. Upon being informed how our ERP system works, she said that the French people would revolt if the same is implemented there.
No kidding, considering how the French people were prone to uprisings in history.
While the general population is well educated and not unable to think, it is a very peculiar trait that 60% of us still fail to see the root of the problem. I just hope that sufficient number in this group could return to plain common sense in 2016.
The answer is simple, the state-controlled mass media has stealthily molded their minds to align their thinking with the government’s thinking. Which is why when social media came on the scene it has such a disruptive effect. Given enough time, social media will neuter the mainstream media.
I share your sentiments. I feel alive in places like Paris and even HK. There is a buzz (as even LKY felt) in many of these great cities, it is where there is a deep sense of history, and freedom to speak without fear or favour. Here, many have been moulded too well by LKY and his brethren to value the superficialities of life. They have learnt to be content with making money and having a roof over their head and they have been trained to fear the unknown. I just hope they have not totally forgotten the meaning of living and being.
I have similar thoughts too, when I see how fellow Singaporeans chase after the latest model of handphone and other gadgets.
Sure, get the Samsung Galaxy S4 if it gratifies you but instead of burying your face in your mobile, do take some time to look around you and smell the roses too. 🙂
There is a buzz in HK (I am Singaporean, and I have been based in HK for over two years now), but liveable it is not. HK is great for tourists, not great for its residents. Singapore is still more liveable than HK. From what I gather of the developments in Singapore, my concern is that we will become like HK soon.
The housing conditions are quite appalling in Hong Kong, and pollution is bad. If by “we will become like HK soon” you mean the overcrowding, I agree that we are getting there. 6.9 million by 2030!
SAC
The problem remains which is where is Singapore’s hinterland or open spaces where she can run to.
So unless the ASEAN cities EU comes out, there will still be no space and no natural aggregation of like minded people where at the moment, it is more right of centre focusing on bread and butter issues and materiality.
regards
Certainly there is no easy answer to the dilemma of conserving our heritage and making space for development. I just think Singapore has already done so well in infrastructure building and modernization that we can pause and think about the price we have paid for development, and eventually, what kind of city we aspire to be.
If we wipe out all vestiges of our short history in the name of development, then what remains of our Singapore identity? No matter how modernized we are, how many skyscrapers we build, I do not think we can compete with cities like New York. What is truly unique about our city?
It is a wonder why so many young French people run away from France to go to Singapore… escaping rampant crime, stifling taxes, high unemployment and a culture that discourage entrepreneurship. Really Singapore has no reasons to envy France.
To each his own, I guess, because everyone’s criteria are different.
But love it or hate it, Paris is a city that evokes strong feelings: http://ecosalon.com/50-best-quotes-about-paris/. Can’t say the same about Singapore.
“Singapore has no reasons to envy France”?
To put it kindly, I think you may have overstated your point.
I challenge you to compare the number of citizens leaving Singapore (aka brain drain) vs that of France, a country the size many times larger. The stats will put Singapore to shame.
Dear Xmen,
I am not able to get my hands on the numbers. Can you tell me the extent of Singapore’s brain drain over the years? Thanks in advance.
Hi SN,
I believe Xmen was putting the challenge across to the commentator who made these remarks – “It is a wonder why so many young French people run away from France to go to Singapore… escaping rampant crime, stifling taxes, high unemployment and a culture that discourage entrepreneurship. Really Singapore has no reasons to envy France” — and not you.
SAC
I don’t have specific numbers. But the reporter Seah Chiang Nee from the Malaysian newspaper The Star has written a few articles on the topic. Here is just one of many articles on Singapore emigration from his site:
http://www.littlespeck.com/content/people/CTrendsPeople-100327.htm
A few quotes from the article –
“Between end-January and mid-March, some 4,500 Singaporeans had registered – a whooping 78% of the total world responses. This is roughly 12% of the 39,000 babies born here annually.”
“In 2002, Singapore was ranked as having the second highest migration rate in the world (next to East Timor) – 26.11 migrants per 1,000 citizens.”
“Some 26,100 Singaporeans have applied for economic visa, for skilled workers and business class, Canada announced. The family category is excluded, but is estimated to number another 40,000.”
“A recent survey of teenagers said 53% would want to move abroad if they had the chance.”
Singapore government controlled MSM has given many people the misconception that Singapore is the best country in the world and everywhere else is ridden with crimes and poverty. It has not worked to keep people from leaving the country. Think for yourself, or at least your children and grandchildren. Enough said.
[…] “There is a certain something in the air, in the look and in the sound of Paris, that cannot be found anywhere else.” George Sand I am back from my sojourn in Paris, a place I knew I would miss dea… The “sticker-lady” incident and the recent arrest of the cartoonist behind Demon-cratic Singapore only affirm what we already know – that Singapore is an inventory of the impossible.Besides a repressive milieu that stifles creativity, the alacrity with which urban planners destroy our heritage also disturbs me. Of course, Singapore has only a very short history but does that not make it more compelling for us to preserve what little heritage we have? The old National Library building and others were long gone, and Bukit Brown is going. What price progress? […]
“Paris requires effort. There are stairs everywhere and the stairs are all but mandatory. In American the stairs are off to the side, and the elevator is prominent. Often, it’s the reverse here—-the stairs are out front and often beautifully wrought. It almost feels sinful to take an elevator. There’s a strong culture of pedestrianism. The streets belong to the people and that encourages walking. On a normal day, I can end up walking for an hour or more. There’s so much to see. And those who don’t walk use the public bike share…
Before I came here so many people told me, “There are no fat people in Paris.” But I think this misses something more telling. There are “no” stunningly athletic people either. There just doesn’t seem to be much gusto for spending two-hours in the gym here. The people seem don’t seem very prone to our extremes. And they are not, to my eyes, particularly thin.”
http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2013/07/there-are-no-fat-people-in-paris/278162/